How will my application be assessed?
All bids will be assessed by a panel of Council officers who have expertise in energy efficiency, retrofit, and sustainability. Using the range of criteria below, each bid will be reviewed and scored on a basis of 1 to 4. Bids with a higher score will receive grant funding. Please see grading criteria below.
Carbon, Community, Inclusion
Criteria |
Questions |
Key Considerations |
Score (1 to 4)* |
Expected carbon savings/reduced energy use
|
What is the anticipated carbon/energy saving?
Is this a meaningful difference? |
Appropriate and exact calculation of carbon emissions in tonnes of CO2 and/or kwH of energy use reduction, demonstrating source, calculation and considers carbon effectiveness of given method.
|
|
Wider community engagement with project |
How does the project benefit and actively engage the ‘wider community’ in behaviour change on reducing carbon emissions?
|
Good strategy to promote the project and encourage changes in behaviour to reduce emissions.
Does the project involve support/engagement with a wide range of community members? |
|
Social Inclusion |
To what extent does the project lead to jobs being created and retained within Hounslow, build community cohesion or address other community needs, demonstrating alignment with Hounslow’s Green Recovery vision for a ‘low carbon, resource efficient, and socially inclusive’ economy?
|
Proposed strategy to create a legacy of environmental, social, and economic improvement.
Does the project consider social outcomes or needs, and use innovative methods to address this? |
|
Planning a Successful Energy Project
Criteria |
Questions |
Key Considerations |
Score (1 to 4)* |
Readiness |
To what extent is the project ready to be delivered? Has all the development/feasibility work been completed?
What degree of technical work, including community engagement, has already been undertaken to help establish the viability of the proposal? |
Feasibility work completed and consent in principle from the landowner/landlord
Use of expert knowledge in planning and/or implementation of the project.
Obtained support with the local community of the proposed project and other interest groups. |
|
Risk |
Have the key risks been identified? Are the risks manageable – to what extent have mitigation measures been developed?
|
Key risks have been outlined, with a sound mitigation strategy to manage associated risks. |
|
Budget |
Is the proposed project budget and associated costs reasonable?
Have the minimum quotes been sought – three above £5,000?
Are there any sources of external funding? |
Reasonable budget breakdown of itemised elements to be funded through grant.
Minimum quotes been sought and provided.
Clearly demonstrates applicant has considered or is receiving match-funding. Sufficient resources in place to deliver the project. |
|
Delivering an Energy Project
Criteria |
Questions |
Key Considerations |
Score (1 to 4)* |
Delivery Plan |
To what extent is there a clear plan in place to implement the project, supported by a timetable of milestones?
|
Project plan clearly sets out delivery timescales and requirements, and is likely to be delivered within 1 to 2 years (larger projects have 2 years to complete)
|
|
Applicant experience
Criteria |
Questions |
Key Considerations |
Score (1 to 4)* |
Relationship with the local community |
Does the applicant have the required experience and skills of working with the local community or any experience in community energy projects?
|
Relevant experience of working with the local community where the proposed project is located or in delivering this type of project. |
|
*Scores range from 1-4 (1 = Low, 4 = High) where:
- Does not meet the minimum key considerations, little to no detail of the project
- Meets the minimum key considerations, but only describes some details
- Meets the minimum key considerations, clearly explains reasoning, and provides evidence to support the project
- Goes beyond the minimum key considerations, detailed explanation and evidence to support the project, demonstrates an innovative approach.